Exploratory Testing 101: The Bugs Hiding Between Test Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b569/9b569b8a2a9da33b8d968fe22c07eb43fda4d608" alt="Hiking"
One of the best analogies we've heard for exploratory testing is picturing yourself as a firefighter entering a burning building. There’s no time to follow a rigid checklist. Instead, you quickly assess the situation, identify the biggest risks, and adapt as you move through the structure. Your expertise and instincts guide you as you respond to what you find in real time.
That’s exactly what effective exploratory testing feels like in software development.
As quality advocates, we often see teams relying solely on structured test cases, focusing on acceptance and regression testing. But critical bugs often lurk in the spaces between test cases, hidden in the unpredictable paths users take. Exploratory testing helps uncover those elusive issues before they reach production.
Why Traditional Testing Isn’t Enough
We’ve all been there. A feature passes every scripted test case, yet users still uncover critical issues. Why? Because users don’t follow scripts. They click things they “shouldn’t,” try workflows no one anticipated, and generally use software in ways that defy expectations.
This is where exploratory testing shines. Instead of rigidly following a script, it embraces curiosity. It mimics real user behavior, both logical and completely unpredictable, to uncover problems before your customers do.
The Art of Exploration
Like our firefighter metaphor, effective exploratory testing requires:
- Identifying high-risk areas quickly
- Maintaining structured coverage while adapting in real time
- Combining expertise with sharp instincts
- Making fast decisions based on observations
Here are some of our favorite exploratory testing techniques:
1. User Journey Mapping
Start by mapping typical user journeys, then intentionally veer off the “happy path.” What happens if a user:
- Gets interrupted halfway through a workflow?
- Completes actions in an unexpected order?
- Uses browser navigation instead of in-app controls?
- Experiences a poor internet connection?
These aren’t just hypothetical scenarios. They’re real-world situations that impact user experience. Testing these paths helps surface issues that scripted tests might miss.
2. Boundary Testing
Push the system to its limits by testing:
- Extreme inputs (very large numbers, long text strings)
- Edge cases (empty states, max limits)
- Rapid interactions (multiple clicks, quick navigation)
- Resource constraints (low memory, slow connections)
Users often do things we’d never expect, like mashing the submit button five times in frustration or entering bizarre data just to see what happens.
3. Context Switching
Users rarely interact with software in isolation. Test scenarios where they:
- Switch between multiple browser tabs
- Get interrupted by notifications
- Leave the app idle for extended periods
- Use multiple devices simultaneously
- Copy and paste data between applications
Real users multitask constantly. They jump between apps, respond to messages, and listen to music. Testing in this context helps uncover usability issues that traditional testing overlooks.
Making It Work in Practice
A common misconception about exploratory testing is that it’s just “clicking around.” In reality, the most effective exploratory testing happens within a structured framework that balances guidance with creative freedom.Here’s how we run our exploratory testing sessions:
- Keep sessions focused. We time-box them to 60–90 minutes to avoid mental fatigue and ensure fresh eyes catch more issues.
- Define a mission. Each session has a clear focus, whether it’s testing the checkout flow, error handling, or a new feature’s interaction with existing functionality. A mission keeps us on track while allowing room for discovery.
- Document findings as we go. We take notes on:
- The flows we’re testing
- Questions that arise
- Potential risks or concerns
- Screenshots or recordings of unexpected behavior
- Write detailed bug reports. When we find issues, we document them thoroughly:
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected vs. actual behavior
- Environment details
- Screenshots or videos
- Why the issue matters from a user’s perspective
- Share insights beyond bugs. Some of the most valuable findings aren’t even bugs. They might be insights into user experience, performance bottlenecks, or potential improvements. We always debrief as a team to share key takeaways.
The goal isn’t just to find bugs. It’s to deeply understand how a product behaves in the real world so we can advocate for quality at every stage of development.
From Theory to Practice
Quality isn’t about sticking to a script. It’s about delivering software that works in real-world conditions for real users. Exploratory testing bridges the gap between what we think users will do and what they actually do.Like a firefighter clearing a burning building, we need to be thorough yet adaptable. Sometimes we find exactly what we expect. Other times, we uncover critical issues hiding in unexpected places. The key is knowing where to look and following our instincts.The most expensive bugs are the ones that make it to production. By investing time in exploratory testing, we’re not just finding defects. We’re preventing user frustration, maintaining trust, and ultimately delivering better software.